Breaking the Wahhabi Cycle: Anahita Hamzei

Will the Cycle of Wahhabism Remain Unbroken?

Western meddling in Middle Eastern affairs, without a doubt, needs to come to an end. Weapons deals, crash training courses, and all funding for ISIS sponsors, like Saudi Arabia, must cease to exist. Most political figures in US, of course, have no intention of putting an end to what they have started; henceforth, these endeavors must be accomplished by the people.

By Anahita Hamzei*

The following article is the final part in a three part series: Part 1/3 and Part 2/3.

Continuation…

Politicians, advocates, and masterminds have incorporated all the right elements into Wahhabi statements of belief, using it to brainwash and control the will of numerous individuals around the globe. Regardless of the dangers, USA has offered up, as a sacrifice, many of their own CIA and militant assets working alongside to help train new warriors, wearing the mask of so-called “Islamic Terrorists” – today’s new “boogeyman.”

Wahhabism Today: The Chickens Will Come Home to Roost

Today, Wahhabism spans across the globe, like the spread of an infectious disease it has been penetratingly on the rise. Based on fictitious doctrine, it captivates followers by manipulating the minds of the downtrodden and naïve, taking claim over the human soul; convincing its members, young and old alike, to accept its risky guidelines and extreme doctrines. And it serves almost as the mother of muse for terrorist groups like ISIS that attract new followers each day.

Ultimately, followers uphold such concepts that most lives are of no value–if not tolerant of their own daunting practices and pursuits. This is a core principle of Wahhabi ideals, members are commanded to have little to no regard for anyone—Christian, Atheist, and Muslims, of any age or gender—whose beliefs do not align with their own, and if they do not accept the strict doctrine, as Taymiyyah would request, they are executed. Subsequently, genocide is a common practice of Wahhabi-centered groups like ISIS today. (17) For that reason, it is without a doubt that Wahhabi Cult, is one of the most dangerous and well-organized Cults of our time–with sub-branches extending outward as hate/terrorist groups recognized by the names of Jabhat al-Nusra, FSA, Al Qaeda, Taliban and so on.

Figure 1. The source and spread of Wahhabism.

ISIS (emerging from leftover Syrian/Libyan/Iraqi “Freedom” fighters) exists as yet another sub-cult of Wahhabism, and they’re all too reminiscent of the Taliban’s brutal past: Like the Taliban, they receive American fighters, trainers, and USA made weapons, even financial and moral support from high paid Hollywood actors and films producers. In fact, USA had numerous ex-military and regular citizens recruited by ISIS and CIA, who fought and died among Wahhabi terrorist groups in Syria.

 One American Wahhabi cult member, Eric Harroun, shortly after returning from combat alongside Jabhat al Nursa died in USA, mysteriously. No one will ever know why or what led him to take up arms with a terrorist organization in Syria (other than having obvious signs of brainwashing, possibly by an institution in USA), but something in his sudden death says that is exactly how US government wanted it.” Eric Harroun was arrested after flying into Dulles International Airport in northern Virginia, returning from the Middle East. Authorities said he had previously made “voluntary” statements to FBI agents about his activities fighting with Al Qaeda in Iraq’s Al Nusra Front as part of an “RPG team” in Syria.” (18)

The list of Westerners recruited to fight with terrorist groups is extensive… one will find. ISIS and similar terrorist organizations continue to use the ideals and doctrines of Taymiyyah or Wahhab to recruit passionate mercenaries, or convince ordinary citizens, through their religious beliefs, it is the only way to go—or else get killed, their cycle of recruitment is everywhere and continuous. This was very much how things have played out in Syria over the past several years; disturbingly, incidents involved the recruitment of young boys under 15. A 31-page report by Human Rights Watch titled, ‘Maybe We Live and Maybe We Die: Recruitment and Use of Children by Armed Groups in Syria,’ “documents the experiences of 25 children and former child soldiers in Syria’s armed conflict. Human Rights Watch interviewed children who fought with the Free Syrian Army, the Islamic Front coalition, and the extremist groups ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra, an Al-Qaeda affiliate, as well as the military and police forces in Kurdish-controlled areas.”(19)

As more journalist in Syria, rebels, adult and child survivors reported on the collaboration of FSA and terrorist groups, it became clear: FSA (backed by USA) was no different than that of ISIS. After the world caught onto the fact that FSA and terrorist groups were practically synonymous in Syria, so USA would not be blamed for their soldiers gone rogue, ISIS suddenly sprout up to cover the tracks of FSA crimes in Syria; by this time, with weapons retrieved, they continued to destabilize and terrorize the whole of the Middle East. (20)

Consequently, who is left to blame in all this? Is it the Muslim child who grew up without a father, because of incoming, non-discriminative bombs initiated under western influence, later sent to a Madrassa for training, which was funded by the Saudi-Western Alliance? Is he the one we should blame, the indoctrinated victim, rather than the global powers at the top of the pyramid scheme and their paid puppets who spread Wahhabism? Or should we blame the infamous fame seekers like FSA/Al Qaeda trainer and US mercenary, Matthew VanDyke? –Van Dyke is also known as the “American Osama bin Landen,” is staunchly supported by the political fat kitten Hillary Clinton, and Hollywood actresses for reaping havoc in the Middle East and promoting the Arab Spring—the kick-start of the bloodiest era for some Asian and African countries today. (21)

IMG_1368
Image: Matthew VanDyke “Freedom fighter” from USA, supported by Hillary Clinton and Angelina Jolie, seen here (on public facebook post) trying to encourage support for FSA ( FSA who has now been accused of merging with ISIS, Al Qaeda, & Al-Nursa, terrorizing Syrians.)

Though many factions and individuals are to blame, it is evident that if there was no grimoire of Wahhabism, the culprits might have never gotten so far. Again, terrorist organizations like ISIS were able to manipulate the ideals of Wahhab; thus, in order to strengthen and broaden their might and influence on the battle field in Syria and in Iraq.

ISIS understood that Wahhabism is the perfectly distorted tool of Islam’s enemy, manifested by the powers that be (Saudi Rulers), ripping through the Middle East: dividing, destabilizing, and terrorizing like a tornado; and those involved in this destruction, if not today holding themselves accountable for their own errors, must be held accountable, somehow. Blame must be rested on appropriate instigators. ISIS today remains a treasured faction in handler states that claim to be “fighting against terrorism.”

Public opinion of ISIS in Saudi Arabia certainly remains favorable. “In June 2014, a poll taken in Saudi Arabia showed that 92% believed, “ISIS conforms to the values of their vision of ‘Islam and Islamic Law,’’ Saudi intelligence has taken notice of this level of public sympathy (due in part to pressure from the U.S.) especially of the blatant Twitter campaigns showing support for the Islamic State and pledging allegiance to Al-Baghdadi. However, as the House of Saud wages its condemnation against ISIS, it is clear that the Wahhabi ideology is firmly cemented in the religious culture of Saudi Arabia casting significant doubt on a change in public opinion.” (22) Despite their damage, ISIS–smothered in Wahhabi dogma–remains the cherished centerpiece on a roundtable encircled by cunning networks.

At the moment, many statesmen and politicians have not learned their lesson–or they choose to remain in a state of stupor; enchanted by a disease of the heart most commonly known as Greed. Leaders from the Western world are ever more committed towards their Wahhabi creations and comrades. They depend on them (Wahhabi indoctrinated rulers and fighters) and will back them, if they keep playing by their rules: A good example would be that of Donald Trumps’ relation with Saudi Monarchy, whom he prances around with, sword in hand, oozing over a magical orb with. It is no wonder Iran, one of the few countries earnestly fighting against the Wahhabi indoctrinated groups, has singled out USA and Saudi Arabia for a recent attack on their soil claimed by ISIS. (23) Nonetheless, as this strong support for Wahhabism remains, things are–most certainly–not hopeless. If those involved in such chaos will not take responsibility, there is hope that the people will wake up and take charge; breaking apart the vicious cycle of fear and hate that Wahhabism has instilled, and bringing about some positive change.

Preventing Wahhabism: Will the Vicious Circle of Wahhabism Ever Come Undone?

“If we try to resolve terrorism with military might and nothing else, then we will be no safer than we were before 9/11. If we truly want a legacy of peace for our children, we need to understand that this is a war that will ultimately be won with books, not with bombs.” Greg Mortenson (24)

One hang up that must be challenged is this almost universal ignorance or unawareness of Wahhabism. Ignorance is an issue on both sides of the pendulum: Both sides of the pendulum, including the individuals who become spellbound by obscurity and those spellbound by Wahhabism. In the Western hemisphere, a majority of people are completely ill-informed when it comes to separating Islam from Wahhabism.  There is an unawareness of Wahhabism’s very existence: For instance, unlike the attention that other followers of extreme ideologies, and dangerous cults have received in the West, Wahhabism has received the ‘Royal Western Flush’ or media black-out.

Take note: Wahhabism is there. It is empirical. It takes hold of those we love–with little warning or recognition. And it has stood protected, loyally supported by millions of people and billions of dollars. It lingers on to claim hundreds of thousands of lives–innocent, not so innocent. (25, 26) As previously discussed, ideologies that spread and gave rise to this cult can be found in books: or on the tongues of peers and scholars; they are in some schools; and possibly implanted in the minds of those we love and trust. It is with certainty that solutions initiated by the West have been ineffective towards containing the issue; addressing the problems arising from terrorism or Wahhabism will never be resolved with bombs and violence. So just how do we resolve things?

Preventing or curbing the spread of Wahhabism will be no easy feat; however, many people have tried to combat this concern peacefully and managed by simply educating others. Education is key. Education is a simple, fruitful, and peaceful solution that can prevent the spread of extremist ideology like Wahhabi doctrine, it can bring to light all the warning signs of corrupted sources–which humanity must collectively reject and peacefully decline. Yes, educating and writing about Wahhabism entails so much skill and dedication. At times it can be like walking on eggshells; educators, advocates, and writers must not make the same mistakes as Taymiyyeh or Wahhab: Many individuals have become overwhelmed with bitterness, anger, and hatred over the devastating results spread by Wahhabism, in turn, they react just as harshly as the oppressors. Everyone, in the fight against extremism, must keep in mind that people indoctrinated by Wahhabi ideologies are not sub-human, they are human; but, they have taken a path wide off the mark, and they must be awakened from their trancelike state. Those who’ve walked into the web of Wahhabism are not incorrigible. The majority of Wahhabi cult members, do not even realize who they are, and have not committed actual crimes themselves–unless taking up arms to fight and terrorize with ISIS—then yes, it is another story. For many, however, like young children and women trained to fight or deceived by male partners, their only mistake is being misled and brought into a cult as vulnerable, sought out victims. (19)

Healing and changing the mindset of hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, indoctrinated by Wahhabi ideology will take a considerable amount of undoing and awareness; just as it was once done, and in some cases continues for children growing up in racist institutions, or for those raised in homes disconcerted by Zionism and Nazism. If we recognize Wahhabism for what it is–an extremely large cult-like organization permeating literature and educational systems around the world—the human community may be able to act better and faster on awareness and education. While educating and learning about the subject, people must also be aware of what Wahhabism is not, and refrain from categorizing people most likely to become followers of Wahhab, like the singling out of Sunni Muslims. There is much distortion and uneducated guesses concerning the ideology, which only creates more friction among Sunni and Shi’a (some only wish to embolden the rift): choose words and collect data wisely. Furthermore, conquering the misconceptions that all Muslims support terrorism must be put to rest: This is sheer ignorance, which in due course escalates hatred; ultimately, leading to fear and often irrationality. Many Muslim communities, Sunni and Shi’a are working hard to undo the effects of extremism more than any other groups these days. (27)

A final point to be taken seriously is, as Ayatollah Khamenei’s website ambassadors recently tweeted, “Terrorism in the Middle East has American roots”: Western meddling in Middle Eastern affairs, without a doubt, needs to come to an end. Weapons deals, crash training courses, and all funding for ISIS sponsors, like Saudi Arabia, must cease to exist. Most political figures in US, of course, have no intention of putting an end to what they have started; henceforth, these endeavors must be accomplished by the people. The people can manage to educate themselves and can educate others. They can also set aside their fears by becoming more involved. Americans, specifically, must stop pushing away Muslims with arrogance and ignorance, and invite them into their lives. Muslims cannot get too cozy either, they have a responsibility to stand strong against those spreading hateful rhetoric wherever that may be. Be aware of those who distort Islam, try to help them cope and understand where the danger lies; it is one of the most human things a person can do to help save another: Involve yourself.  Largely, Wahhabism ends where it began, with education and knowledge.

IMG_1411
2011–VanDyke “Freedom Fighter” in Syria, collecting money from big names, to kick start a bloody revolution and US made “Arab Spring” that has caused much instability, brutality and violence since being kick-started.

Conclusion:

To close, terrorism is nothing new, humanity has had their share with it, time and time again. They manage with what they know of it–in their familiar zones– often without thinking or realizing what they’ve endured is terrorism or extremism. The problem lies, therein, when it is a type of extremism that many are oblivious to. The wave of Wahhabi extremism comes with many unfamiliar elements, and instead of learning about it, for many, it’s easier to be lazy and rest blame all Muslims rather than get to the heart of it. This collective misconduct only stirs up greater calamities, as it has done in Western countries with the rise of Islamophobia–in such a noxious environment the hate filled circle of extremism shall never be unbroken. This analytical, and hopefully informative, series was intended for that reason: A guide to awaken and enlighten, to inject hope where it is lacking; thus, the acrimonious circle of Wahhabism may someday be broken. And, since humankind has dealt with extremism before and conquered it too, Wahhabism is hardly different from other forms of extremism; therefore, it’s important to keep in mind: Wahhabism is not going to end our world. We are going to end Wahhabism, Insha’Allah.

Works cited:

17. Why Don’t We Hear About the Persecuted Christians? Moore, Natasha. Ney York, NY : ABC.net , 2014.

18. Ex-U.S. soldier accused of joining Al Qaeda-linked group in Syria. Serrano, Richard A. Los Angeles : Los Angeles Times , 2013.

19. Syria: Armed Groups Send Children into Battle. Staff. New York  : Human Rights Watch, 2014. 978-1-62313-1425.

20. FSA brigade ‘joins al-Qaeda group’ in Syria. Staff. Doha : Al Jazeera Media Network, 2013.

21. Iran blames US for creating ISIS amid worsening Middle East tensions. Griffiths, James and Alkhshali, Hamdi. Atlanta : Cable News Network, 2017.

22. Wahhabism, ISIS, and the Saudi Connection. Clapper, Lincoln. Toronto : Geopoliticalmonitor Intelligence Corp, 2016. ISSN 1927-3045 .

23. VanDyke, Matthew. MatthewVandyke.com Events. Matthewvandyke.com. [Online] 2013. http://www.matthewvandyke.com/events/.

24. Mortenson, Greg and Relin, D. Oliver. Three Cups of Tea: One Man’s Mission to Promote Peace – One School at a Time. s.l. : Penguin Group, 2007. 978-0-14-303825-2.

25. Dozens of Iraqis killed as Isis targets Baghdad during Ramadan . Chulov, Martin. Baghdad : The Guardian, 2017.

26. Storyline: Isis Claims Kabul Hospital Attack, Taliban Remains Main Threat. F. Bruton, Brinley and Mengli, Ahmed. New York : NBCnews.com , 2017.

27. How to Stop Extremism before it Stops. Stephan, Maria J. and Beyerle, Shaazka. s.l. : Foreign Policy , 2015.

Other sites where this article has been published:

http://ijtihadnet.com/will-cycle-wahhabism-remain-unbroken/#comment-2257

http://english.khamenei.ir/news/4920/Will-the-Cycle-of-Wahhabism-Remain-Unbroken

http://aassak13.ir/post/Will-the-Cycle-of-Wahhabism-Remain-Unbroken

The Wild West and their Tango with Wahhabism: Anahita Hamzei

The West and their Tango with Wahhabism: Western Role in Augmenting Extremism

23orb-master768

“Why would the Western World even consider spreading dangerous ideas of Ibne Taymiyyah and Wahhab? And didn’t they take into account the immeasurable destruction that could result from injecting Wahhabi fanaticism into these regions? USA’s entanglement with Saudi Wahhabism has definitely been one heck of a tempestuous tango–so to speak.”

By Anahita Hamzei*

The Following is the continuation of last week’s article titled, “The Roots of Wahhabism, What Everyone Should Know,Part 1/3.

Click here to read part 3/3.

Continuation… The Long Dark Shadow of Wahhabism:

The alliance was strong, on the brink of something phenomenally dangerous and disastrous.  And this occurred on a greater scale than Taymiyyah or Wahhab could’ve ever imagined. Wahhabism since has been emboldened, because of a Global Clique–US, Israel, Saudi, and Britain–nurturing its development and productivity, viewing Wahhabism as effective doctrine for taming human subjects; thus, molding several Wahhabi practitioners into militant-controlled extremists, used to fight on behalf of the Global Clique’s material interest and political agendas in the Middle East.

Part II:

The Wild West and their Tempestuous Tango with Wahhabism:

With Wahhabism in effect as the “opiate of the masses,” Saudi Arabia had been molded into the perfect test site for its (Wahhabism’s) future expansion. A model society it was. Easy to manipulate and extremely micromanaged: The conditions were favorable for monitoring the potentiality and ease of spreading Wahhabi concepts into large communities. The end result would be a desirable one for Saudi Monarchy, who yearned for the adoration of people everywhere, cleverly disguising the infusion of cultish ideals into targeted domains through “charitable pursuits.” Oil was their bread-and-butter to achieve set goals. Using the disguise of “zakat/charity” they found a way to spread the Wahhabi tentacles of influence through every nook, crevice and cranny—with their Western partners by their side.

Poor, rural areas were first introduced to the Wahhabi Cult dogma–outside of Saudi Arabia; they were shadowed as the next of regions on a long list to implement strict, intolerant, fascist Wahhabi ideology: Saudi’s plans happened to coalesce with US government’s intent to combat the Soviet Union in the 1970’s. Afghanistan had been invaded and occupied in the midst of the Cold War by the Soviet Union. Coincidently, USA’s agendas amalgamated with that of Saudi Arabia’s; henceforth, they became greater allies in supporting the indoctrination of Wahhabi ideologies (7). The Wahhabi initiative commenced as planned. Training and conditioning through Wahhabi-centered manuscript and literature, funded by Saudi Arabia’s “charitable” printing press, took off as an extensive campaign in this region. USA, by way of CIA and other secretive military operations, took part in promoting Wahhabi doctrine to raise a strong “Mujahidin” front with their Saudi partners in fascism.  It was a desperate and greedy attempt. USA could not fathom a strong Soviet Union, especially while on the brink of war–and this is not to say what the Soviet Union did was right, as well.

 “In the 1970s, with the help of funding from petroleum exports and other factors, Saudi charities started funding Wahhabi schools (madrassas) and mosques across the globe and the movement underwent “explosive growth”.  The US State Department has estimated that over the past four decades Riyadh (alone) has invested more than $10bn (£6bn) into charitable foundations in an attempt to replace mainstream Sunni Islam with the harsh intolerance of its Wahhabism. EU intelligence experts estimate that 15 to 20 per cent of this has been diverted to al-Qaida and other violent jihadists.” (8) But, Why? Why would the West even consider spreading dangerous ideas of Ibne Taymiyyah and Wahhab? And didn’t they take into account the immeasurable destruction that could result from injecting Wahhabi fanaticism into these regions?

USA’s entanglement with Saudi Wahhabism has definitely been one heck of a tempestuous tango–so to speak. They needed familiar dogma, to appeal to a wider audience: You could not radicalize Christians in a predominant Muslim environment and expect favorable results. These achievements could not be accomplished in the way that Judaism and Christianity were used to defend Madeline Albright’s and Bush’s reasoning, respectively, for butchering children in the Middle East. (9) What worked for US and Israel could never work in the Middle East, where people, for most part, speak the religiously dominant language of Islam. Recognizable ideologies that Muslims could relate to were a prerequisite for attracting potential fighters. Vulnerabilities among the poor were played upon, raising a new breed of warriors who could culturally and spiritually connect with the people; and, they did this during some of the most trying and detrimental moments of these people’s lives; thus, mercenaries were easily provoked under the influence of Wahhabism to fight on behalf of the axis of evil. The West, for most part, disregarded potential disastrous consequences laid out by mathematical calculations—if ever applied–they most certainly had the intelligence to foresee a formidable outcome.

In addition, many people denied that Western nations were schooled on the dangers brewing in Asian countries through the promotion of Wahhabi ideologies; while, in fact, U.S., UK, and other powers concentrated in the West, who have dirtied up their hands using the Wahhabi initiative, were just as guilty as the Saudi government ever was… perhaps more. Western powers and their Middle Eastern allies were made aware of the dangers triggered by the spread of Wahhabi doctrine: regardless, they recklessly used elements of fanaticism that worked towards their own advantage. When this network of global powers realized how Taymiyyah-Wahhab ideals controlled certain actions and thoughts of humankind, effectively–right down to what hand and foot to begin the day with–for them it seemed the perfect apparatus–necessary to control their RoboMercenaries. It would also seem to be the most beneficial stratagem for the West, in terms of efficiency–they preferred to kill more of “the others” rather than “their own kind.” Furthermore, during those times, Westerners would never agree to terms of war if they knew the truth, or if more of their “own” were sacrificed for another bloody war… Wahhabwashed pawns were the easiest bet to wager on; especially, after Americans endured one long hard fight to pull out of another failure–Vietnam.

On the other hand, Western powers and politicians were not the only ones aware of sinister plans brewing in the midst of Wahhabism’s rising.  American advocates on the ground, Asian countries in particular, took note of these proportionally epidemic-like findings. They fought the spread of the massive Cult—blacked out by mainstream media–lurking as a secret WMD (Weapon of Mass Demoralization). They brought their knowledge of Wahhabism straight to congress. Activists, like Greg Mortenson, led many attempts to warn US congressmen on undermining this mounting matter. Beginning with the educational system, he recognized that in parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan, Saudi funded schools were creating young extremists in militant centered madrassas (Arabic word schools): This can be found and fully explained in his book Three Cups of Tea. (10) Although his work was well intended, insightful, and could have saved many lives, he was virtually shut down: Silenced and ridiculed. Ethnocentric critics and those with their own agendas labeled his works as “Pro-Islamic”—as if there is nothing prejudice in that objection—despite his rigid fight to expose militant training of children in Wahhabi-centered schools. Nevertheless, those overwhelmed by ignorance refused to accept the validity and practicality of his work: They rejected Mortenson’s sincere warnings and slandered him instead. The CIA (USA’s Central Intelligence Agency) would not back Mortenson, as an alternative they probed him. The capitalist nation had ultimately shamed him; since, men like Greg Mortenson came with no profit: It would have taken an entire act of kindness to enter the initiative Mortenson called for, which is something they knew little of.

As they frowned on the Mortensons of that era, USA sponsored Wahhabi loyalist like Osama bin Laden. They pledged their allegiance to Bin Laden and the Taliban’s mission. US media was also on the Bin Laden fighting side.

An article from USA newspaper, The Independent, praising Osama Bin Laden in 1993

USA’s very own Frankenstein: Osama Bin Laden

Subsequently, Osama Bin Laden became USA’s own version of “Frankenstein” taking Wahhabism to daring new heights, using the doctrines to create Kamikaze like combatants among the people of his realm. It was no secret, Bin Laden was a fan of Ibne Tamiyyah: “Al Qaeda former leader, Osama Bin Laden famously quoted Ibn Taymiyyah’s Fatwa of Madin as justification for civilian and Muslim casualties in his terror attacks.” (11) Bin Laden was one of leading “gurus” on Taymiyyah-Wahhab ideals and implemented them wherever he laid his turban. He was the western labeled “Freedom Fighter,” whom, ironically, stripped away at any freedom in regions where his “Midas touch” stretched. What seemed like a promising mission of glittering wealth and prosperity for the sordid Saudi-Israelican (Saudis, Israelis, & Americans all bunched up in one) alliance would form an everlasting dark cloud, lingering over the Earth and her inhabitants–one that dampers our doorsteps today. Osama bin Laden with CIA, helped manage and create the most treacherous Taliban tribes of his time, which also gave rise to Al Qaeda and Jundallah. Little did Osama realize, or maybe he did, that he would be a scapegoat for an event bigger than Pearl Harbor–in the making…

The W Factor: 

By the time the 90’s rolled around, at the start of the Bush-Clinton dynasty rule, the US, seemingly immune to the division and damage caused by Wahhabi loyalist in Asia, continued with praises for Saudi Arabia and stuck to their rock solid alliance. They clung to their terrorist creations and plans for future destruction in the Middle East–where leaders not only rejected Saudi Israelican policy, but also the imposition, destruction, and suppression that Wahhabi inspired cults and groups had forced upon their lands and people.

The Bush dynasty, especially, had a common goal with the Saudi dynasty in securing control over countries like the Islamic Republic of Iran, to increase their own political power and wealth. Politicians, like former president George W. Bush appeared to completely adore their equally brutal and gluttonous Royal Saudi friends. “W” (pronounced: Dub-Yuh) brought and welcomed Wahhabi doctrine disguised as Islam, throughout media, into the US; which contributed towards its upsurge on US soil and in some (not all) US masjids. His test subjects were easily available in US prisons. He was passionate about Wahhabism as a form of “therapy” for criminals in US corrections facilities. Some criminals later became terrorists and passionate Wahhabi indoctrinated scholars. (12) Bush was the Bin Laden of the USA, carrying on Osama’s torch in his part of the world. In fact, Bush rested so much faith on the “promising effects” of Wahhabism that he was one of the most open and aggressive US presidents to promote the illusive dogma.

An actual scholar of Islam explains how in Bush’s time a “radicalized Islam,” which the writer recognized as Wahhabism, made its way into the US prison system. Daveed Ross writes for The Weekly Standard in 2005: “BEFORE ENTERING THE COUNTERTERRORISM FIELD, I worked for a radical Islamic charity called the Al Haramain Islamic Foundation. In this capacity, I gained some familiarity with the kind of Islamic extremist literature that often finds its way into the U.S. prison system and thus influences inmates’ religious education. I was, after all, one of the people responsible for distributing this literature. He further informs the reader: “THE INTERNATIONAL AL HARAMAIN ORGANIZATION was originally formed as a private charity in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in 1992. (13)

Alternatively, a more liberal American writer, Linday West, argues: Bushes’ views on Islam were “progressive,” simply because he praised Islam, or seemed to. (14) Little did the writer delve into the content and material of what Bush was actually encouraging; and, it was not Islam he encouraged: it was Wahhabism. Moreover, she seems to shrug off the influence that he was under at the time, his “open-minded” behavior was enthusiastically appreciated. Uhum, thanks… but, no thanks. West did not even, courageously, scratch the surface of what Middle Easterners, mostly Muslims, endure, because of Wahhabism’s existence. Many fell for Bush strategy in the past, and many have regrets today. He was truly a, “Man of Words and not Deeds.” W and OBL were analogous in the sense that both could spellbind the public with their layman’s tongue, steering those captivated by their enchantment away from truth. His plans, eventually, seemed to fall into place for what was soon to hit the American people hard on the catastrophic day of 9/11.

From a fanatical Western position, Wahhabism may have worked as a great tool for militarization—then. But as many have witnessed, now and then, the fascism and hatred Wahhabism promoted would come back to haunt everyone. Shortly after, as 9/11 struck fear in Americans, the USA’s CIA—convincing the public and most politicians oblivious to anything Wahhabi-centered–implemented one of their own operatives with a familiar name, Osama Bin Laden, as the mastermind behind the 9/11 attack.

US then led what seemed to be a faux aggression against the perpetrators of the 9/11 disaster. They used the questionable event as a scapegoat to situate their aggression on a region where the money was. Iraq. The Western nations, acting on this so-called aggression of war, despite claims of an inside job, set up the entire globe for the backlashing consequences of Wahhabism to be felt on their own soil, to inject fear and paranoia into the hearts and minds of their own people–just as some Middle Easterners felt under the umbrella of USA… Terror networks would manifest from east to the west, north to south, embracing Wahhabism as a weapon under the pressure of a belligerent US led invasion…To Be Continued

Works Cited

7. The Saudi Connection: Wahhabism and Global Jihad. Choksy, Carol and Jamsheed, Choksy. Washington, DC: World Affairs Institute, 2015.

8. Staff. What is Wahhabism? The reactionary branch of Islam said to be ‘the main source of global terrorism’. Telegraph. [Online] March 26, 2016. [Cited: April 17, 2017.]

9. Blum, William. Madeleine Albright Ethically Challenged. Williamblum.org. [Online] February 2001. [Cited: April 17, 2017.]

10. Mortenson, Greg and Relin, David Oliver. Three Cups of Tea. New York: Penguin Group, 2007. 0-670-03482-7.

11. Islamic Philosophy. WordPress. [Online] December 9, 2015. [Cited: April 6, 2017.] http://islam.hilmi.eu/ibn-taymiyyah-the-founder-of-isis/.

12. Prison Islam in the Age of Sacred Terror. Hamm, Mark. S. 5, Oxford: The British Journal of Criminology, 2009, Vol. 49. 667-685

13. Ross, Daveed. Prison Jihad. The Weekly Standard. [Online]  [Cited: April 21, 2017]

14. West, Linday. The US Debate around Islam Makes George W. Bush Look Progressive. The Guardian. [Online] November 22, 2015. [Cited: April 21, 2017]

*Anahita Hamzei is a two time graduate from the Texas A&M University System. She has received B.A.s in the human sciences and earned a Master of Science degree in Sociology. Mrs. Hamzei is an award winning speaker and researcher with published works in various fields of human and life sciences. She has traveled and lived in the Islamic Republic of Iran since 2013. She now journals and writes about her experiences, via news sites and social media, in an effort to debunk stereotypes and misconceptions spread by western propaganda.

Other sites where this article has been published:

http://english.khamenei.ir/news/4898/The-West-and-their-Tango-with-Wahhabism-Western-Role-in-Augmenting

http://ijtihadnet.com/west-spreading-dangerous-ideas-ibne-taymiyyah-wahhab/

https://anahitahamzei.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/the-roots-of-wahhabism-what-everyone-should-know-by-anahita-hamzei/